The conversation then shifts to the Great Exhibition of 1851, where Prince Albert tried to make the Koh-i-Noor the glittering centerpiece of imperial Britain. Instead, the display was widely judged a fiasco. The stone, cut in the older Indian style, looked like an irregular rock rather than a modern brilliant-cut diamond, and Albert’s increasingly desperate attempts to improve the presentation did little to impress visitors. Determined to salvage the gem’s symbolic value, he ordered it recut in 1852 despite strong technical objections. Amsterdam cutters under Moses Coster reduced it from 190.3 to 93 carats, a drastic loss that the hosts present as both a material and cultural transformation: Britain was literally reshaping an Indian treasure to fit European tastes. In parallel, they tell the story of Duleep Singh, the deposed Sikh ruler from whom the diamond had been taken. Raised under British control, welcomed into Queen Victoria’s circle in 1854, and painted by Winterhalter in a highly charged imperial portrait, he became personally entangled with the object that symbolized his dispossession. In a central scene, Victoria tested whether he would accept her wearing the recut stone, and he ceremonially handed it back to her. The hosts close by arguing that the Koh-i-Noor still operates as a diplomatic and moral problem: a relic of conquest, a symbol of empire, and for many in India an active restitution claim rather than a settled inheritance.