#80 Henry Ford (Today and Tomorrow)

Podcast: Founders
Source: whisper-base
Language: en
Duration: 2744s
URL: https://afp-922710-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/57933a1d-c5a9-4040-9aca-e766ae2ec0eb/episodes/da67f36d-252e-42aa-938a-279fcb605f3f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&awCollectionId=57933a1d-c5a9-4040-9aca-e766ae2ec0eb&awEpisodeId=da67f36d-252e-42aa-938a-279fcb605f3f&feed=3hnxp7yk
Fetched: 2026-03-03 09:22:57

We are being born into opportunity. For hundreds of years, men have been talking about the lack of opportunity and the pressing need of dividing up things already in existence. Yet each year has seen some new idea brought forth and developed, and with it a whole new series of opportunities. Until today we have already have enough tested ideas which, put into practice, would take the world out of its slows and banish poverty by providing livings for all who will work. Only the old, out-worn notions stand in the way of these new ideas. The world shackles itself, blinds its eyes, and then wonders why it cannot run. Take just one idea, a little idea in and of itself, an idea that anyone might have had, but which fell to me to develop. That of making a small, strong, simple automobile, to make it cheaply, and pay high wages in its making. From a mere handful of men employed in a shop, we have grown into a large industry, directly employing more than 200,000 people, not one of whom receives less than $6 a day. Our dealers and service stations employ another 200,000, but by no means do we manufacture all that we use. Roughly, we buy twice as much as we manufacture, and it is safe that another 200,000 are employed on our work outside, fact in outside factories. That gives a rough total of 600,000 employees direct and indirect, which means that about 3 million men, women, and children get their livings out of a single idea put into effect only 18 years ago. And this one idea is only in its infancy. These figures are given now with any thought of boastfulness. I am not talking about a specific person or business. I am talking about ideas. And these figures do show something of what a single idea can accomplish. And this has matured in less time than a child matures. What nonsense it is to think or speak of lack of opportunity. We do not know what opportunity is. So that is from the introduction of the book that I read this week and the one I am going to be talking to you about today, which is today and tomorrow by Henry Ford. And this is a book that was first published in 1926. I found this book because of this idea that you and I talk about quite frequently, which is that books are the original hyperlinks, and they link us from one idea, much like the modern web, one idea to another, and one person to another. I was reading, I can't even remember which book I came from, but another founder was talking about what he learned from this book, and I didn't even know that this book even existed. I was like, wait a minute. What is today and tomorrow? And I have read a few books by this time. Turn them all into podcasts. So if you just search Henry Ford and Founders Podcast, you could see all of them. So it was a pleasant surprise because this is another, after reading Henry Ford's autobiography, which is my life and work, you see that he gets right to the point. He speaks very plainly, and it's almost like a journal of sorts, where he's just his ideas on not only the work he does at Ford, but he talks about all kinds of different topics, like education and war and economics and the meaning of money and the meaning of work. So it's like a lot of good practical knowledge for us, but also a lot of exposure to his own philosophy on life, which I particularly appreciate. So let's not waste any time. Let's go ahead and get back into the book. And I just love this idea that he talked about. He's like, listen, look at what one single idea can accomplish. And it's just a reminder that there are just always new opportunities. And if you're on my email list, I just sent an email to everybody on the list. I was watching Jeff Bezos talk probably about 20 years ago. The video I was watching took place 20 years ago, rather. And he has this bizarre and I mean that in the most flattering and possible, because I never heard anybody else talk like this. This is metaphor about the web's future. What's the internet future? And he's like, it's not the gold rush. It's more akin to like, he calls it the electricity metaphor. And in that, he talks about like every single new idea or every new business creates two new opportunities. So therefore, like we're not living in this zero sum game anymore, like Henry Ford was just talking about. He's like the opportunities out here are limitless and they're only going to multiply faster. So it's just a good reminder that there's always new opportunities. And here Ford is echoing a very similar sentiment, what 100 years before Bezos did. So he says with the maturing of industry, a whole new world of opportunity opened up. Think about how many doors of creative activity every industrial advance has opened. It has turned out through all the fierce competitive fights that no man could succeed in his own opportunity without creating many times more opportunities than he could begin to grasp. That's what I'm personally skeptical about. This idea that we're going to ever get to a point where technology does everything we wanted to do and we're just going to be all sitting around with nothing to do. I don't, I see no evidence of that at all in history. In fact, I see the opposite that the more that we're able to invent new products and services and more, we're able to put different ideas into implementation, that's only going to create other opportunities for other people to pursue in the future and future generations. Okay, so he says, and this is something I always blows my mind because I think I talked about this on a podcast a week or two ago. And we're all trying to build things that other people can use, right? That's what a product does. It's to quote Richard Branson, like a business is just something that makes somebody else's life better, you know? Like your entire point of making a product is to be in service of other human beings because if no one uses it, then there's no utility. There's no benefit that either crews back to you or that goes first to society. But could you imagine making a product, like Henry Ford did, that literally changed the geography of the world? Invention of the automobile and more importantly, the mass production of it, I guess is what he really invented. And obviously with the mass production and making it affordable for even like the average person to purchase, it literally changed the nature, like the natural physical world around us. It's such a bizarre idea. So he's talking about this. He says, with the motor car, and that's what he calls on automobiles, does, among other things, quite apart from its own usefulness, is to familiarize people generally with the use of developed power, to teach what power is and to get them about and out of the shells in which they have been living. Under the motor car, many a man lived and died without having been more than 50 miles from home. That is the past of this country. It is still true of much of the world. And on the very same page, another idea that he's going to, I mean, he dedicates an entire chapter to this. He has this thing called a wage motive, which I'll get to in a little bit, but he's just like this, and when you're running a business, like almost every single other entrepreneur we've ever talked about on this podcast, he has a focus, a fanatical focus on keeping costs low, and he's like, has just an innate distaste for waste, right? But he's like, you don't look at wages as a cost. You need to keep your cost low and your wages high. So he says, the workman has also had to be protected, and someone invented the living wage notion. All of, and he doesn't agree with this at all, all of which grows out of a complete misconception of the entire industrial process, so he continues. The plain fact is that the public which buys from you does not come from nowhere. The owner, the employees, and the buying public are all one and the same, and unless an industry can so manage itself as to keep wages high in prices low, it destroys itself. For otherwise, it limits the number of its customers, and I love that because it's just, I don't claim to speak for all of modern business, but I feel that most companies look at wages, especially if you think of like the ones that are rewarded on like a short-term focus, quarter to quarter basis, like one way to squeeze out profits and to artificially and freight and fleet temporarily, your stock price is to push down wages. But Henry Ford is like, this is stupid, this is very short-term thinking. Like those customers, the wages you're pushing down are not only your own customers, but customers of other businesses, and there's no way that you can prosper with low wages. And unfortunately, I don't know if we're in a weird, if you think of the weird economic environment, where we're just in a bizarre time in history. So I have no idea how this is going to play out, but I would just say that like if you're in a position where, that's why I always say like the best description of entrepreneurship besides like that Peter Drucker quote, which I really love, and I always reference that, entrepreneurship is not an art, our science to practice. The best one I've ever heard is describing entrepreneurship is really, it's an out of money option. And if you're in an environment where you think that you're not getting compensated, commiserate with the amount of skill and talent that you bring, and that's what most entrepreneurs believe. If not, they'd go get a job. Because they'd be like, oh no, the market has already accurately assessed the value that I bring to society. So therefore I'm willing to take a job. That's what you're doing when you have a job. Entrepreneurs are saying no, no, no. It is not mispriced, it's mispriced, and I'm going to prove that by delivering value and then collecting a part of that value, right? So unfortunately, if you're working for wages, which most people are, you're at somebody else's whim, you know? And maybe you're in an environment where you're in industry that's growing and you have skills that you can then make other businesses compete for that, but if not, you really have no leverage. And that's just a dangerous place to be. So again, if you're personally in that situation, find a way to work for yourself. And if you're already working for yourself and you're hiring people, just hire, and Ford's going to hit on this over and over and over and over and over again in this book, that like if you're paying, if you're artificially suppressing the wages you're paying, he's like, you're getting lower quality work, that lower quality work. You think you're saving money today, but you're really going to pay for it much more in the long term. And again, this is just thinking that it's, unfortunately, extremely rare in society, but extremely common in the people that were covering these books. Let's see, the note of myself was the opposite of autopilot. Think about what you're doing. I don't know what to mean. Okay, what that means. It says, all men are not voluntarily intelligent. They must be taught. All men do not see the high escape from drudgery and work by putting intelligence into work. They must be taught. That's interesting. The high escape from drudgery and work by putting intelligence into work. All men do not see the wisdom of fitting means to ends of conserving material and he always talks about material. This is such another unique idea. I'm going to say that over and over again because this guy just, I mean, it makes sense why he, why so many of the entrepreneurs that we admire today, study and admire him. He's birthed so many founders that are using his ideas and you can see why. So he considers, I'm going to reread and start this part over in a second, but this isn't important. Like, when he's using materials for production, right? He doesn't think of it as just as like a, you know, just these natural resources that appear at a nowhere. He says, you have to choose, treat materials sacred because that's the results of others' labors. Okay, so let's go back to this and keep in mind, this book is from 1926. He's going to use the word men, this applies to women, it applies to everybody. It's just not, it's just, at his case, like I don't even know if he had any women working for him. So when you hear that, just in our day and age, it's people. So it's that all men are not voluntarily intelligent. They must be taught. All men do not see the high escape from drudgery and work by putting intelligence into work and they must be taught. All men do not see the wisdom of fitting means to ends and he's going to talk about this. You need to start with what is your objective in business and I'll cover that in a little bit of conserving material of saving that most precious commodity, something he repeats over and over again. Time. They must be taught. So he's saying, listen, really think about what you're doing, now my own note makes sense to me. The next section, every business or product exists to serve customers, this is priority number one. Again, something that should be, if you've listened to a bunch of these, it's, you see that, that trend over and over again. We look at, we look at how a serving corporation, so he talks, he makes a distinction in the book, the difference between a business that's set up to serve. It's a service to like the general population, it's customers, and those serving money, he hates the ones that are serving money. So he considers what he's doing, a serving corporation. If we look at how a serving corporation comes into being, first of all, it has to be designed to furnish some service. The corporation has to follow the service. The service does not follow the corporation. The design is what counts. Everything in this world to be made rightly has to follow a design and time spent in getting a thing right is never wasted. It is time saved in the end. So he has a very, it's no wonder, remember the podcast I did on by Mark Spitz-Nago, the book, The Dow of Capital, had this huge element about, listen, do not just think about time is in the present. You have to look at it in the spectrum. And he called, I said, if you read that book, and I recommend it, because it just mind-blowing. The classic example of how to look at time from an entrepreneur's perspective, because Mark is doing it as an investor, he referenced Henry Ford. I could have easily just taken all the quotes and passages out of that book and made an entire, he's talked about so familiarly, I could have made an entire another podcast just on the Henry Ford part. And it makes perfect sense when you study how Henry Ford thinks. And that's another example. He's like, listen, time, everything that has to do with time. And in this whole idea of design, I don't know who said it. Maybe is Abraham Lincoln? I don't remember, but the famous quotes, like, listen, if you give me six hours to cut down a tree, I'll spend the first four sharpening the axe. That's exactly what Henry Ford's saying here. He's like, listen, start with what you want to do. Then put the time and effort up front into designing it. It's, you're not wasting time by spending time on the design, because if you don't do that at the beginning, you're going to pay for it at the end, and it's going to be much more costly. Okay. A simple but not easy guiding principle. The test of the service of a corporation is in how far its benefits are passed on to the consumer. So again, focus on what's like serving the customer number one, and then trying to spread that benefit as much as you can. So the way Henry Ford did that was by lower in cost, increasing wages, and with, he lives in a different age, obviously, than we do, you needed to have, be a much, you know, you needed to have the economies of scale back then to lower the prices. Now you can do the same with much smaller companies, because of the, you know, the transition that we're going in from the analog to digital. Putting profit above service leads to inevitable death. Okay. Let's see what he means here. Business must be run out of profit, I skipped that, sorry. Business must be run out of profit, else it will die, but when anyone attempts to run a business solely for profit and thinks not at all of the service of the community, then also the business must die, for it is no longer has a reason for existence. The profit motive, although it is supposed to be a hard-headed and practical, is really not practical at all, because it has its objectives, the increasing of prices to the consumer, and the decreasing of wages, and therefore, it constantly narrows its markets and eventually strangles itself. That accounts for much of the difficulty abroad. He's talking about all the stagnation in other parts of the world at this time, and right there is a good, maybe one paragraph, description of, you know, Ford's guiding principles and how he wanted to conduct business. Ford, like many people that we study in history, warns us to be wary of debt. And he says, another rock on which business breaks is debt. Debt is nowadays an industry. Learning people in the debt is an industry. The advantages of debt have become almost a philosophy, and as you could guess, he does not agree with that philosophy. The debt motive is basically a slave motive. When business goes into debt, it owes a divided allegiance. This is so important. The scavengers of finance, when they wish to put a business out of the running or secure it for themselves, always begin with the debt method. We talked about this last week. Why do so many people that are already financially set choose to sell their businesses to warn Buffett and Charlie Munger? Because they know if they sell to Warren and Charlie, they'll reap the benefit, but Warren and Charlie want them to keep running their business. They wanted to see exist. A lot of people, like let's say private equity, will buy that business, load it up with debt, sell it off the parts, they'll make a lot of money in the process, but the business dies. And if you've spent your whole life, think about why this advantage accrues to people like Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger. If you spent your whole business, your whole life's building up this business. You have an intimate relationship with your employees, you're intimate relationship with your customers. You don't want to see that happen. Of course, you're going to go to them. And so that advantage accrues to them. All right. So once on that road, the business has, this is such a good point. Once on that road, the business has two masters to serve. The public and the speculative finance year. It will scrimp the one to serve the other, and the public will be hurt. For debt leaves no choice of allegiance. Businesses free itself from dominating finance by keeping itself within its earnings. Just good old practical old school knowledge from Henry Ford here. This is Ford on profits, long-term thinking, and resourcefulness. Profits may be stupidly fixed and stupidly used. If so, they destroy their source and vanish. A business which charges too high profit disappears about as quickly as one that operates at a loss. The duty of every manager of industry is to encourage business by making it easy for people to obtain what they needed a price they can afford. Interesting. To hold up prices is to tax the people more heavily than a government ever could. Good management pays dividends and good wages, lower prices, and more business. It is very bad management that can see any revival of national ambition only an opportunity to lay heavier burdens on the spirit of enterprise. This ought to be self-evident. No one who gets rich quickly stays rich. Going into business just to get rich is a waste of effort. We do have a type of business whose only objective is a swelling of someone's personal fortune. A business which exists to make one man or family rich and whose existence is of no moment when this is achieved is not solidly founded. I love the clarity of his thinking. This is something that we all, I'm definitely speaking for myself, need to focus on and something that's really important. Let's see. Focus. The importance of focus. And so what is the focus of Henry Ford? It was a focus of his life. We're in the motor business and in no other business. Everything that we do gets back to the motor. So that's very simple. It's easy to make this. He talks about this in the book quite a length and he gives explicit detail of how much material he uses, how much it costs, why is he doing that? And it all comes down to, listen, we're in the motor business. He says a car is just, we're not, we're not, we're making cars, but really what we're doing is we're putting wheels on motors. And I was like, wow, that's a really interesting way to look at it. So anything that comes to, like when they're making decisions, like will this decision, right, further our one goal, our one goal is to manufacture motors. He says, we have built, and he talks a little bit more about this. He says we've built nothing for the sake of building. We have bought nothing for the sake of buying. We make nothing for the sake of making. Our operations all center around the manufacture of motors. So sometimes you have to buy material, sometimes you have to make it yourself, whatever decision you're choosing, it's all oriented around what the hell is your purpose. Why does your business exist? And it's so surprising when you look at, when you study modern businesses, and I'm sure this is true in the past too, because history doesn't repeat, human nature does. It's like they have one goal and then they get distracted by all these other shiny things. We talked, Charlie Munger talked about this last week, he's like don't you remember this point in history where every one oil company goes out and buys a fertilizer company? And then what do all the oil companies do? They start buying fertilizer companies. And then this whole bubble plays out and realizes I didn't need to buy the damn fertilizer company to begin with. Well they got away from what are their main goal is. So I just love that. I love that because it's a simple yet hard idea to adhere to. This is Henry Vortelling us that we can always improve. It is one of the oddities of business that a man will cite what he has done in the past as proof of what he can do in the future. The past is only something to learn from. So he talks about this a lot of times, like listen, we thought we were all cool, we thought oh my god, we made three million cars this year, this is amazing. And then now we make 10 or whatever the number is. I'm just making these numbers up for illustration purposes because I don't have the note in front of me. And he's like just listen, the learn from the past, but don't think that's the apex of human achievement. You can improve on that constantly. And he's going to keep a few pages later. He keeps hitting on this point that things can always be improved. The only tradition we need to bother about in industry is the tradition of good work. All else that is called tradition had better be class as experiment. What a good frame, like a thing of frame for your mind when you're analyzing the past. These are just experiments. These are the results of experience, experiments. There's ideas that we can take away that are good, ideas that are bad that we don't replicate, but it's not the end of human progress. It seems hard for some minds to grasp this. The easy course is to follow the crowd to accept conditions as they are, but that is not the way of service. It is not the way of sound business. It is not even the way to make money. Of course any man may, following this line, fall into a bit of good luck and make a million or two. Just as a gambler sometimes wins heavily. In real business, there is no gambling. A real business creates its own customers. That's, I love that idea. Our own attitude is that we are charged with discovering the best way of doing everything and that we must regard every process employed and manufacturing as purely experimental. We do not make changes for the sake of making them, but we never fail to make a change once it is demonstrated that the new way is better than the old way. We hold it our duty to permit nothing to stand in the way of progress. It is not easy to get away from tradition. That is why all our new operations are always directed by men who have had no previous knowledge of the subject and therefore have not had a chance to get on really familiar terms with the impossible. So this is another way of, he has this famous quote that he never employs experts in full bloom and he is talking about that right here, he is like, listen, they are always directed by men who had no previous knowledge of the subject and therefore had not had a chance to get away, get on really familiar terms with the impossible. Sometimes experts in industry, they are experts on what is not possible based on their own collective knowledge, but when you have somebody that is just brand new, they approach it maybe approach it from a different way that people are already in the industry have not been taught and they wind up finding these weird improvements that no one thought about. No operation is ever directed by a technician for always he knows far too many things that can't be done or invariable reply to it, to our invariable reply to it can't be done is go do it. Focus on doing one thing well, another thing that he repeats a lot. We do nothing at all in what is sometimes ambitiously called research, accepting as it relates to our single objective. We believe that anything else would be outside our province and possibly done at the expense of our own particular function which to repeat is making motors and putting them on wheels. Our principle duty as we conceive it is to not wander from our own path but to learn to do one thing well. This is a worthy way to spend your time. The true end of industry is to liberate mind and body from the drudgery of existence by filling the world with well-made low-priced products. And there's another reminder that there's always more opportunity. What is the best way to do a thing? It is the sum of all the good ways we have discovered up to the present. It therefore becomes the standard. To decree that today's standard shall be tomorrow's is to exceed our power and authority. Such a decree cannot stand. We see all around us yesterday's standards but no one mistakes them for today's best which superseded yesterday's will be superseded by tomorrow's best. That is a fact which theorists overlook. Ford spends quite a bit of the book talking about what he believes, like what proper business management is. That's a good way to think about what Ford's basic thoughts on what management is. We look upon industry largely as a matter of management. And to us, management and leadership are quite the same. We have no patience with the kind of management that shouts orders and interferes with instead of directing the men at their work. Real leadership is unobtrusive. Our aim is to arrange the material and machinery and to simplify the operations so that practically no orders are necessary. This is kind of an echoing that famous quote by Jeff Bezos. Most companies are trying to figure out how we can communicate better. He's like, no, no. The fact that you're communicating is a sign of dysfunction. It's an actual sign that you have not communicated properly with other areas in the organization how to get what they need from you. So he says, it's much better that if there was no communication, what's the best customer service of a company? We're having to contact customer service. So he's kind of echoing that here. He's like, to simplify the operations so that practically no orders are necessary. Unless management begins on the drawing board, it will never get into the shop. Each man and machine should do only one thing. And then this is Ford, his relentless focus on costs. Once we had large supply rooms and men lined up at the windows to get their tools, that was waste. We found it often costs 25 cents worth a man's time not counting overhead to get a 30 cent tool. With that, we abolished the central tool room. So what he does there, he just reverses instead of men, employees waiting in line to get their tools, they have a separate set of employees that bring them to him. And he goes into this whole chapter is about all the different ways. They were just, again, focusing on seconds. So you can save a ton of money in the future because of how big his operation got. So it reminds of paying dividends. Same thing with like, they made everything waste height. So they realized if somebody had to bend down or move or in a position like they'd work slower. So again, you don't over optimize at the very beginning, like first you started on a shop, doing it rather crude. Once you got it down, then you had a relentless focus on optimization, especially when it comes to costs in time. And then the relationship between the two. Okay. So this is an example that founders tend to have extreme personality traits. And he's got an entire chapter, he titled the meaning of time. Okay. This kind of goes back to what I was talking about with the doubt of capital. And this is, this is an example of, you know, Henry Ford's an extreme character or was an extreme character. Hiring two men to do the job of one cry, or excuse me, stepped over the punchline there. Hiring two men to do the job of one is a crime against society. To carry a product 500 miles to the consumer, if that product can be found within 250 miles is a crime. For a railroad to deliver in 10 days, what a might deliver in five is grand larceny. This guy is serious about not being wasteful. It is not possible to repeat too often that waste is not something which comes after the fact. Restoring an ill body to health is an achievement, but preventing illness is a much higher achievement. Picking up and reclaiming the scrap left over after production is a public service, but planning so that there will be no scrap is a higher public service. Time waste differs from material waste and then there can be no salvage. The easiest of all wastes and the hardest to correct is the waste of time. Because wasted time does not load the floor like wasted material. In our industries, we think of time as human energy. And the note I just left myself is one of my favorite quotes that I remind myself constantly. Don't waste time, you don't have much of it. And this is the results of continuous improvement over a long period of time. Our production cycle is about 81 hours from the mine to the finished machine in the freight car. The three days and nine hours instead of 14 days, which we used to think was record breaking. Kind of see why he thinks why he says and he believed you could always improve. Let's see. So this is about saving resources. It is not possible long to continue to get something for nothing, but it is possible to get something from what was once considered nothing. So you can't get something from nothing for nothing, but it is possible to get something that from what was once considered nothing. So taking a different approach and he gives an example of saving on wood. This is at the root of our efforts to save timber. We are trying to use as little lumber as we can and here's the crazy thing. So he focused on it. I just wanted to decrease the amount of lumber we use. But he says so we use less wood each year, meaning today at the time he's writing that, in spite of our ever-growing production, so he's doing more with less. Another way to think about that is getting something from what was once considered nothing, and saving our costs is the same thing as it has the same effect in your bottom line, all things equal as increasing sales. There are two parts of the same coin. Okay, this is Ford on the wage motive, which is like his central thesis on business. So this is going to be the longest part that I read to, just because it infolds over so many pages. Okay, so let's go over what the wage motive is. We are, as a matter of policy, against hard work. We will not put on the back of a man where we can put on the back of a machine. There is a difference in a man working hard and hard work. A man working hard will produce something, whereas hard work is the least productive sort of labor, and one that he believes should be outsourced to machines. Somehow a deal of confusion has crept into wages, hours of work, profits, and prices. Most of this confusion traces back to an unwillingness on the part of someone to work. And so what is that, what is this confusion caused by people that don't want to work, right? And so he describes the people that don't want to work as trying to do the impossible. That is to live without work. And now take wages. An unemployed, this is, you're going to get a central core of like his thoughts on why he keeps, his wages high and costs low. An unemployed man is an out of work customer. He cannot buy. An underpaid man, meaning you're trying to squeeze that because you think of wages as a cost. An underpaid man is a customer reduced in purchasing power. He cannot buy. Reduce wages and you reduce work because you reduce the demand upon which work depends. So he's going to continue this line of thought here. And he says, high wages with high prices do not help anyone. It just means that everything else has been marked up. But higher wages and low prices means greater buying power, which means more customers. The payment of high wages, however, is not just a matter of wishing to pay them. So he's like, you don't, you don't get to the point we are just by saying, okay, I'm just going to pay high wages. I could bankrupt you. You can't just wish to do it. You have to do the work necessary first to get to that point. It goes, in his opinion, it goes back to the very structure of the business itself and the idea on which it is founded. If you set out to make something which will help people, then you have to plan slowly and surely, trying out as you go along until you have what you believe is right. Then and not until then, have you anything worth while making? The next step is to find out how to make it and that is a job which is never finished. And he's going to remind you here, your employees are part of your public. If you cut wages, you just cut the number of your own customers. If an employer does not share prosperity with those who make him prosperous, then pretty soon there will be no prosperity to share. And he continues, fully to carry out the wage mode of society must be relieved of non-producers. Meaning people that just refuse to work and contribute to society. We need more creators than we ever did. Not fewer. And now we have Ford's Principles on Management, or of Management, rather. And he said, the Ford Principles of Management, the Principles are extremely simple. They may be compressed into three statements. Number one, do the job in the most direct fashion without bothering with red tape or any of the ordinary divisions of authority. Two, pay every man well, not less than $6 a day, and see that he is employed all the time through 48 hours a week and no longer. Three, put all machinery in the best possible condition, keep it that way, and insist upon absolute cleanliness everywhere in order that a man may learn to respect his tools, his surroundings, and himself. And then in the book, he gives the example of they had to buy a railroad and they didn't want to, just because they thought they were getting ripped off and they wound up being right. So like, well, the amount of savings we would get if this was operated efficiently would be greater than the cost to buy the railroad, so we'll just buy the railroad, and then he applied those principles in order to turn the thing around. Okay, so this is Ford giving us advice, like he's like, listen, you could apply these principles to any business. And something that is important to him was, the way I say it's important to him is because he repeats it over and over and over and over again, is that you have to first, the very first step, you have to think about the kind of business you want. Like really spend a lot of time sharpening the acts, if you will, think about what you want to do. And like not only the product you want to make, but how you want to, like, how you want your business to be organized. So you said at first we could do little, then gradually we could do more and more. And today we are able to do a great deal, although we have more ahead to do than we have behind us done. We are going forward all the time. These methods are changing so constantly, not because we like changes, changes for themselves, because the firm policy of always striving to lower the price and raise the quality just naturally forces improvements. The question to ask oneself is not, what are the best methods for a man with a business like mine to adopt? But what am I in business for? Where am I going? What do I want to do? So you say, answer those questions first and then you'll figure out which principles you need to use. And one of those principles that he believed in was that all of your actions should serve your objective. And he talks about that in the sense of making, he says, we never make for the sake of making. This I think answers the question of how our methods might be put to use by the smaller manufacturer. It is not the method, but the objective that controls. To work backwards, what is your objective and then adopt your methods to that? Your methods are formed by what you are trying to do. They do not determine your purpose. To my mind, it is starting wrong to put methods ahead of purpose. And in the same chapter, you're going to hear from Ford on what he thinks about competition. It is doing anything in less than the best way, not competition that matters. If we do that, if we do that, which is before us, if we do that, which is before us, to do in the best way that we know how, that is, if we faithfully try to serve, we do not have to worry much about anything else. The future has a way of taking care of itself. And I don't know if I'll add. I think he's picking up there that so few people and so few businesses are run this way. If we just focus, he's saying, listen, if we faithfully try to serve, and that's our main objective, our main focus here, we're serving the public and his point, the public and the customers are the same exact thing. So when he's saying I'm serving the public, he's saying serve your customers and goes in both directions. You're not going to have to worry about anything else because not only is it just like a central tenant of the way he would organize business and manage them, but in my opinion, and I don't think he states this here, although he does talk a little bit about people that don't really know, like he talks about some business owners are just better off getting jobs. But it's because this is so rare that it's so valuable. And to be able to do so on such a long, like a long time period is even more rare. At this point, he's saying, what, this is about 18 years since his innovation in the Model T. So the idea that you can continue to keep that eye on that ball, your eye on that objective for 18 years is extremely rare. It goes against the normal way of our species. And I'll just close on this. This is not the longest book. If you want to pick it up, I'll even link in the show notes for, like I always do it. And every other book that I do is available at Amazon.com, Forch.shop, Forch.shop, Forch. Founder's podcast, like always, I would, I'd pick it up and read it. I think it's, I mean, like if you, if you like the way Henry Ford thinks, and I'm assuming like you've listened to the other podcast on Ford, I would, I just don't think you can waste your time by, by studying Henry Ford. Henry says, this actually comes from the last chapter, and he says, let this be made clear. There is no way out of poverty except through work. The world has tried everything but work. And this is what I was referencing earlier about like, what is the point of what we're doing? Like why do you want to build a company? Why do you want to build a product? Why do you want to build a service? He gets, like he, he's very capable of doing, like gets right to the heart of the matter. And he says, industry exists to make things that people use. I just love that, that sentence and, you know, the way, again, what I just mentioned here, I heard Richard Branson says, a business is just something, a product or service that makes somebody's life easier, or life better. There is nothing in business itself that necessitates, necessitates failure. But men who enter business unprepared by training in its special points take failure with them. Business never fails. Only men do that. The way into business is through the door of work. I love that quote. All right, and that's where I'll leave the story. If you want to pick up the book, I got this paperback version, it's like this really tall version. Today and tomorrow by Henry Ford, Thomas Wisdom for a modern digital age. But there's a bunch of, you know, this book is so old, like there's a bunch of other independent printers. So just choose whichever one that you like. It's probably an audio book version of this, which I thought would be, which would probably be interesting. I'd imagine it's available. I haven't confirmed that though. So I'll leave, and if you want to buy the book, obviously, in support of the podcast at the same time, I'll leave a link in the show notes. And I would say if, in case you're not on my private, you are, keep saying private. On my personal email list, my personal email list is David's notes. I take notes on entrepreneurship, just like I take notes. So basically, like, when entrepreneur speaks, I listen, I take notes, and I email you the notes. It's really all there is to it. If you'd been, if you aren't on it yet, let me just tell you some of the ideas, like people that I've recently taken notes on. So there's a Mark and Dreson and Ben Horowitz talking about the difference of entrepreneurs today and maybe in the past that went out. Jeff, I took notes on Jeff Bezos and the electricity metaphor for the web's future, which I referenced earlier, Bill Gurley on all things, business and investing, Bill Gates on advice for founders, his mistakes in philanthropy, an interview with Patrick Collison, the founder Stripe, who's a really unique and interesting thinker, another podcast on Bill Gurley on why the abundance of capital stays big as challenge and the right way to think about market size when assessing opportunities, Peter Teele on monopolies, entrepreneurship in society, Matt Mullenweg, the founder of WordPress on the operating system for the open web, which I found interesting, Charlie Munger's commencement address. He did about 15 years ago on USC, interview a podcast with Elon Musk talking about Tesla and autopilot, very fascinating. Another video named running your startup by Patrick Collison again, notes from Naval Robocon's appearance on the Joe Rogan experience, which is really fascinating. That's actually a really long note, Mark and Dreson on Change, Constraints in Curiosity. It just goes on and on and on and on. I have over 5,000 individual notes in the archive if you want to go to look at that. But anyways, you can just go to davisnotes.substac.com, I'll leave a link too. You can go through the archive if you want, for it's that URL, for such archive. But if you just want me to email you the notes, every time I do notes, then join that email list. Thank you very much for your support. I have something coming just for misfits soon, and it's just additional podcast I'm going to be doing in addition to the every other one that you guys are getting exclusively. I'm doing the history of American technology from 1976 to 1980 or 1860, maybe. I don't have the book in front of me. I don't have the book in front of me. That's coming, and then I'm doing, oh my goodness, I got myself in a pickle here, man. I'm doing all the Berkshire Hathaway shareholder letters, and that's going to be just for you guys as well. That is a monster. If I had to guess, and I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty sure that's going to be the longest podcast I've ever done by a long shot. Of course, that's only going to you. Thank you very much for your support. Thank you for listening, and I'll talk to you next week.