Twitter/X

@americanhousing argued on 2026-03-10 that reducing commutes requires either more…

2026-03-10 · 14:58 UTC ·@americanhousing ·0 min read

Brief

@americanhousing makes a concise pro-housing argument that long commutes can be reduced through two parallel housing strategies: denser development near employment hubs and homes suited to remote-working parents. The post frames these as complementary rather than competing approaches and ties the claim to Scott Lincicome’s February 2026 New York Times argument about commutes and family formation.

Why it matters

@americanhousing argued on 2026-03-10 that reducing commutes requires either more housing density near job centers or more homes designed for at-home working parents.

Key details

  • The post explicitly endorses doing both strategies at once: increasing urban density and building housing that supports remote-work family life.
  • The tweet references Scott Lincicome’s New York Times opinion piece published on 2026-02-09, titled “Want More Babies? Abolish Commutes.”
Source evidence

title: @americanhousing: Want to abolish commutes?

You either have to build more density near job centers OR build homes for...
author: @americanhousing
contenttype: tweet
publication: Twitter/X
published: 2026-03-10T14:58:40+00:00
sourceurl: https://x.com/americanhousing/status/2031384249232753101

word_count: 35

Want to abolish commutes?

You either have to build more density near job centers OR build homes for at-home working parents.

We do both!

Scott Lincicome (@scottlincicome)

"Want More Babies? Abolish Commutes." nytimes.com/2026/02/09/opini…

— https://nitter.net/scottlincicome/status/2031329079362805980#m