Twitter/X

On 2026-04-01, @paultoo amplified a Crémieux post claiming that a study exposed…

2026-04-01 · 00:03 UTC ·@paultoo ·0 min read

Brief

@paultoo shares Crémieux’s accusation that a fraudulent study remained uncorrected one year after its problems were known. The post argues that the authors knowingly published false work, that journals and institutions failed to issue any correction or retraction, and that this lack of accountability reflects a broader indictment of scientific publishing.

Why it matters

On 2026-04-01, @paultoo amplified a Crémieux post claiming that a study exposed as wrong and fraudulent a year earlier still had no correction, public statement, or retraction.

Key details

  • The post alleges the authors knew the study was wrong when they published it and characterizes the broader scientific literature as "largely fraud and slop."
  • The core claim is that the researchers caused harm yet faced no punishment or accountability despite the alleged fraud being known for a year.
Source evidence

title: @paultoo: The Science is largely fraud and slop

Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil)

Think about this:

It's been a ...
author: @paultoo
contenttype: tweet
publication: Twitter/X
published: 2026-04-01T00:03:11+00:00
sourceurl: https://x.com/paultoo/status/2039131426420084885

word_count: 57

The Science is largely fraud and slop

Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil)

Think about this:

It's been a year since we learned this study was wrong and that the authors actually committed fraud and knew it was wrong when they published it.

No correction, no statements, and certainly no retraction.

These researchers did harm and have gone unpunished.

— https://nitter.net/cremieuxrecueil/status/2039101973211861262#m