Reader · no content
No body text on file.
Open the original to read the full piece.
Exposing Nonprofit Fraud Could Come With a Price Tag
Brief
California Assembly Bill 2624 would expand the 25‑year‑old Safe at Home confidentiality program to cover a wide range of immigration support providers — from legal clinics to health care and translation services — and impose a civil remedy of at least $4,000 per violation plus attorney fees without an explicit press exemption. The measure, authored by Assemblywoman Mia Bonta and sponsored by CHIRLA (which has received $14.3 million in state funds since 2020), cleared the Assembly Public Safety Committee 7–2 on April 21, 2026, and moved to Appropriations on April 27. Supporters cite harassment incidents; opponents — including Republican Carl DeMaio, independent journalists, and some Democrats — argue the broad definitions and civil penalties would let well‑funded nonprofits sue freelancers or local outlets and chill accountability reporting, while criminal enforcement would still require proving intent to facilitate imminent violence. Critics urge adding an explicit press exemption and narrowing the bill to organizations with documented threats.
Why it matters
AB 2624, authored by Assemblywoman Mia Bonta, would extend California’s Safe at Home protections to “designated immigration support services” and create a civil penalty of at least $4,000 per violation plus attorney fees — with no press exemption written into the bill.
Key details
- The bill cleared the Assembly Public Safety Committee 7–2 on April 21, 2026, and was re‑referred to the Appropriations Committee six days later (April 27, 2026).
- “Designated immigration support services” is defined broadly to include legal representation, advocacy, case management, humanitarian relief, translation, counseling, and health care; CHIRLA, the bill’s sponsor, has received $14.3 million in state funds since 2020.
- Critics warn the real chilling effect will come from civil suits (notably a $4,000 minimum plus attorney fees); criminal prosecutions would require proving intent to facilitate imminent violence, a high evidentiary bar — Assemblymember Carl DeMaio labeled it the “Stop Nick Shirley Act.”