Where Should We Begin? with Esther Perel

My Parents Got Divorced, So Why Am I Still in the Middle?

Brief

A woman who had just turned 40 took a one-time intervention call with Esther Perel about being stuck in a decades-long triangle with her parents. Her parents married when they were teenagers, stayed together nearly 40 years, and divorced three years ago; the caller says the marriage had long been dysfunctional at home. She describes herself as the family peacemaker and de facto therapist who absorbed her mother’s grievances and tried—unsuccessfully at times—to hold her father accountable for his mood swings, emotional inconsistency, and what she views as years of mistreatment of her mother. The father has since begun a 'new life' with a younger partner, has pulled back from his grandchildren, and many members of his extended family have sided with him and his new wife, leaving the mother feeling socially excluded and repeatedly asking, “I just want my family back.”

Perel guided the caller through two linked problems: how to keep a genuine relationship with the father and how to stop being an emotional repository for her mother. Perel reframed the father’s behavior as a difference in emotional language — he responds to actions and concrete invitations (e.g., 'come next Sunday') more than to disclosures like 'I miss you' — and encouraged the caller to adopt pragmatic strategies to secure contact if she values the relationship. Simultaneously, Perel urged firm boundaries with the mother: interrupting or refusing repetitive narratives that the caller finds herself internalizing, using clear lines such as 'I can't carry this with you,' and helping the mother rely on other supports (friends, therapist). The conversation charted a practical, if uncomfortable, path forward: stop trying to unify competing family stories, own the wish to have the father present and take the concrete steps that reliably bring him close, and gradually resign from the mediator role while recognizing it will require trial, error, and emotional recalibration.

Why it matters

Caller (a woman who turned 40 a few days before the recording) says her parents were married almost 40 years and legally divorced three years ago, but lived an 'invisible divorce' at home for decades and she functioned as the family’s informal therapist/peacemaker throughout.

Key details

  • The caller reports an on-again/off-again relationship with her father: a recent explosive fight at a nephew’s birthday was followed weeks later by a warm visit with him and his new wife; she says he now shows little emotional reciprocity and has largely stepped back from his grandchildren.
  • Esther Perel advised the caller to 'speak the language of her father' — i.e., use pragmatic, action-oriented asks (for example, a concrete invitation: 'come next Sunday') instead of seeking emotional validation, because the father historically responds better to invitations than to overt emotional disclosures.
  • The caller says she repeatedly tried confronting her father about his past treatment of her mother (and about his emotional distance) and that he takes no accountability; Esther reframed the problem, asking whether the caller is carrying her mother’s feelings rather than her own.
  • Esther recommended firm boundaries with the mother: interrupting or declining to carry repetitive stories about the father (phrases suggested include, 'I can't carry this with you' and requesting the mother take her own therapy space), because the caller physically senses when her mother transfers emotional material onto her.
  • The caller described family fallout beyond the couple: the father's extended family (eight siblings total, six living) largely sided with him and his new wife, socially excluding the mother; this tribal dynamic complicates attempts to 'get the family back' for holidays like Thanksgiving and Christmas.
Reader · no content

No body text on file.

Open the original to read the full piece.