No body text on file.
Open the original to read the full piece.
Greg Brockman testified at trial that he both understands the claims against him in detail and, when pressed on cross-examination, twice said he 'never really been certain what I'm being sued for,' even as Musk's lawyer framed the lawsuit as alleging breach of OpenAI's charitable mission to develop safe, open-source AI for humanity and prohibit individual profit. Under oath Brockman admitted holding $30 billion of OpenAI equity with no invested capital, receiving a secret $10 million payment from Sam Altman in 2017, and writing diary entries describing plans to 'get out of Elon' and convert the nonprofit to a b-corp. He also disclosed four undisclosed financial ties (Cerebras, Stripe, CoreWeave, Helion), said the OpenAI Foundation had zero full-time employees until this lawsuit, never fulfilled a $100,000 pledge, and drafted a December 2023 charter removing a primary duty to humanity—facts the author argues amount to unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty while Brockman 'played dumb' about the suit's basis.
Under oath on May 5, 2026, Greg Brockman repeatedly told the court both that he 'never really been certain what I'm being sued for' and that he 'stands by' that testimony after cross-examination by Musk's lawyer, who stated the suit alleges breach of OpenAI's charitable mission (develop safe open-source AI for humanity and prevent individual profit).
Open the original to read the full piece.