Reader · no content
No body text on file.
Open the original to read the full piece.
On 2026-05-05 @om_patel5 reported two developers plus two Claude Code instances…
Brief
om_patel5 describes a 2026-05-05 experiment where two developers and two Claude Code instances jointly planned a feature in a single chat room; both AI sessions shared project context, codebase access, and docs. The posted workflow emphasizes a shared plan, clear frontend/backend ownership, human checkpoints, per-turn summaries and a decision log, while warning that paired AIs can reinforce hallucinations even as they act like a four-person engineering team.
Why it matters
On 2026-05-05 @om_patel5 reported two developers plus two Claude Code instances collaborating in one chat room to plan a feature, with both Claude sessions able to access the same codebase and reference the same documentation.
Key details
- The workflow centered on a shared written plan both agents could read/update; explicit frontend vs backend ownership boundaries; a human checkpoint before any agent edits files; per-turn short summaries to prevent drift; and a decision log for API shapes, data models, and rejected approaches.
- He warns that paired AI models can amplify confidence, hallucinate, and quietly drift from requests, but claims two devs + two Claudes already function as a four-person engineering team and that the approach scales with more agents.