Reader · no content
No body text on file.
Open the original to read the full piece.
Greg Brockman altered his explanation twice within 24 hours for a November 2017…
Brief
Greg Brockman changed his explanation twice in 24 hours for a November 2017 diary line he labeled 'morally bankrupt,' first claiming it meant serving the mission and later that it meant removing Elon Musk from the board. Under questioning by Musk lawyer Toberoff, Brockman couldn't quote the journal, acknowledged ~460 pages were produced, denied communications about removing Musk, and the diary—now in evidence—corresponds to a conversion executed without removing Musk, which the author links to a knowing breach of charitable trust.
Why it matters
Greg Brockman altered his explanation twice within 24 hours for a November 2017 diary line he called 'morally bankrupt': yesterday he said it meant 'actually serve the mission, hard to look at yourself in the mirror,' and this morning he said it referred to 'removing Musk from the board.'
Key details
- In deposition, Musk attorney Toberoff noted ~460 pages of the journal were produced; Brockman would not confirm the exact number, could not quote the passage, admitted no emails or texts with board members, Sam Altman, or Ilya Sutskever about removing Elon Musk, and said he 'sees no inconsistency' between his shifting explanations.
- The diary is in evidence; the conversion to a B corp was executed and no board removal occurred, a fact the author frames as supporting the legal element of a 'knowing breach of charitable trust.'