Local Energy Rules

How Much Are You Paying For Utility Profits? — Episode 270

Brief

The episode centers on Paying For Their Profits, a report from the Energy and Policy Institute, with Research & Communications Director Daniel Tait joining John Farrell to explain how much of consumers' electric bills flow to shareholders and why. Tait traces his interest to long outages after 2011 tornadoes in Alabama and then moves to the report's core findings: from 2021–2024 the median investor‑owned utility retained roughly 13% of revenue as net income, and preliminary 2025 data indicate that share rose to about 15%. He and Farrell note outliers in the Southeast—Florida Power & Light and Georgia Power—where profit shares can reach roughly 20–30% of the bill. EPI published an interactive tracker based on publicly available FERC and SEC filings so customers can look up their own utility.

Tait clarifies methodology and limits: the calculation is net income divided by total revenue drawn from FERC Form 1 and earnings reports, but it misses profits embedded in restructured markets from third‑party generators or retail suppliers, so numbers are likely conservative for many customers. The conversation distinguishes profit margins from regulators' return on equity (ROE): regulators set ROE (commonly around 10%), but ROE compounds across repeated capital expenditures (the "mortgage" analogy), so a seemingly small ROE change can mean hundreds of millions of dollars for a large utility. Causes for high profits, Tait argues, include heavy utility lobbying, the technical and resource‑intensive nature of rate cases (utilities can hire consultants and often pass those costs to customers), and weak funding for intervenors. Farrell adds a practical contrast: his Xcel example showed about 15% of the bill to profit, while an ILSR ROE‑based calculator estimated roughly $150/year of excess charges for his household.

On remedies, the episode surveys options rather than prescribing one solution: lower or better‑justify ROE; limit what earns a regulated return; bolster consumer advocate resources and transparency; and adopt performance‑based ratemaking. Tait points to model legislation (American Economic Liberties Project) and active efforts in several states including New York. The pair underscore urgency: as utilities undertake multidecade capital builds, getting ROE and revenue allocation right now will determine whether customers are saddled with decades of excess profit extraction or see meaningful relief and better‑prioritized investments.

Why it matters

Daniel Tait (Energy and Policy Institute) reported in Paying For Their Profits (analyzing 110 investor‑owned operating companies) that median profit captured from customer bills was about 13% for 2021–2024 and rose to ~15% in the 2025 data available so far.

Key details

  • John Farrell highlighted that in some U.S. areas up to 30 cents of every dollar paid to an electric utility goes to shareholder profits; EPI noted particularly high profit shares (roughly 20–30%) for utilities such as Florida Power & Light and Georgia Power.
  • EPI's method: Tait said the team used public financial disclosures (FERC Form 1, SEC filings, utilities' earnings reports/calls) to calculate profit as net income divided by revenue, and published an interactive 'profit tracker' so consumers can check their own utility.
  • Limitation: Tait emphasized the tracker excludes profits earned by third‑party generators or retail suppliers in restructured markets (e.g., PJM, Texas), so reported profit shares are likely a floor rather than the full profit embedded in some customers' bills.
  • Tait and Farrell contrasted profit margin vs. return on equity (ROE): ROE set by regulators (commonly near 10%) compounds across repeated capital investments; small ROE changes (±1%) can translate to hundreds of millions of dollars for large utilities like Alabama Power or Georgia Power.
  • Causes identified by Tait: strong political influence and lobbying by utilities, resource asymmetry in rate cases (utilities can hire armies of lawyers/consultants and bill customers for those costs), and arcane, resource‑intensive regulatory processes that limit effective public participation.
Reader · no content

No body text on file.

Open the original to read the full piece.