ArXiv

GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguard

Authors
Urchade Zaratiana, Mary Newhauser, George Hurn-Maloney...
Categories
cs.CL, cs.CR
arXiv
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07982v1
PDF
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.07982v1

Brief

GLiGuard is a 0.3B-parameter, schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder (adapted from GLiNER2) that encodes task definitions and label semantics into structured token schemas to evaluate prompt safety, response safety, refusal detection, 14 fine-grained harm categories, and 11 jailbreak strategies in one non‑autoregressive forward pass. On nine safety benchmarks it matches F1 of 7B–27B decoder guards while being 23–90× smaller and yielding up to 16× throughput and 17× lower latency. Summary based on the paper's abstract only.

Why it matters

GLiGuard is a 0.3B-parameter schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder (adapted from GLiNER2) that encodes task definitions and label semantics as structured token schemas to evaluate prompt safety, response safety, refusal detection, 14 fine-grained harm categories, and 11 jailbreak strategies in a single non-autoregressive forward pass.

Key details

  • Across nine established safety benchmarks (paper published 2026-05-08), GLiGuard achieves F1 scores competitive with 7B–27B decoder-based guard models while being 23–90× smaller, delivering up to 16× higher throughput and 17× lower latency; code and models available at https://github.com/fastino-ai/GLiGuard.
Source evidence

Abstract

Ensuring safe, policy-compliant outputs from large language models requires real-time content moderation that can scale across multiple safety dimensions. However, state-of-the-art guardrail models rely on autoregressive decoders with 7B--27B parameters, reformulating what is fundamentally a classification problem as sequential text generation, a design choice that incurs high latency and scales poorly to multi-aspect evaluation. In this work, we introduce \textbf{GLiGuard}, a 0.3B-parameter schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder adapted from GLiNER2 for LLM content moderation. The key idea is to encode task definitions and label semantics directly into the input sequence as structured token schemas, enabling simultaneous evaluation of prompt safety, response safety, refusal detection, 14 fine-grained harm categories, and 11 jailbreak strategies in a single non-autoregressive forward pass. This schema-conditioned design lets supported task and label blocks be composed directly in the input schema at inference time. Across nine established safety benchmarks, GLiGuard achieves F1 scores competitive with 7B--27B decoder-based guards despite being 23--90$\times$ smaller, while delivering up to 16$\times$ higher throughput and 17$\times$ lower latency. These results suggest that compact bidirectional encoders can approach the accuracy of much larger guard models while drastically reducing inference cost. Code and models are available at https://github.com/fastino-ai/GLiGuard.

Comment: 20 pages, 4 figures