e.economist.com

Off the Charts: Let’s keep things in perspective

Brief

Rosamund Pearce’s May 12, 2026 Off the Charts newsletter links two strands: hard news visualised and guidance on technical diagramming. On the news side, the piece notes the Strait of Hormuz has been effectively closed for over two months, producing a major energy‑supply shock that has raised US petrol prices and disrupted trade in items from plastics to pistachios; it also flags SIPRI data (reported by Sondre Solstad) that, on a purchasing‑power basis, America’s allies now outspend the US on defence for the first time since 2001, and reminds readers Britain’s Rent Act began on May 1, 2026 with possible unintended effects. On the craft side, Pearce explains projection choices — oblique, isometric (equal axes), dimetric/trimetric and perspective — gives concrete examples (Chernobyl reactor, Hong Kong flats, geothermal schematic), and advises when to use 2D versus 3D tools (Blender, three.js) and why projecting text often reduces readability.

Why it matters

The Strait of Hormuz had been “all but shut” for more than two months as of the May 12, 2026 newsletter, causing one of the largest energy‑supply shocks in history and driving up US petrol prices while disrupting shipments of other goods such as plastics and pistachios.

Key details

  • New SIPRI data — reported in the newsletter and analysed by Sondre Solstad — show that, when adjusted for spending power, America’s allies now outspend the United States on defence for the first time since 2001.
  • Britain’s new Rent Act came into force on May 1, 2026; the newsletter (citing James Fransham) warns the law aims to reduce insecurity but could have unintended consequences for landlords and tenants.
  • Visual‑data journalist Rosamund Pearce outlines projection choices for illustrations: oblique (keep one face undistorted), isometric (equal x,y,z axes — used for Chernobyl’s fourth reactor and Hong Kong flat diagrams), dimetric/trimetric variants, and perspective (naturalistic, with vanishing points; use Blender or three.js to switch camera from orthographic to perspective); she recommends 2D for scale and heavy labelling because projected text can be harder to read.
Cleaned source text

Also: Mapping the Iran war’s trade disruption

May 12th 2026 For subscribers

Off the Charts

The best of our data journalism

Marie Segger

Data journalist and interim special-projects editor

For more than two months the Strait of Hormuz has remained all but shut. Each day it remains closed, the burden on businesses and consumers grows. Most Americans feel the impact of the war at the petrol pump. But it’s not just oil that isn’t flowing anymore. From fuel to food, many industries rely on trade that passes through the strait. We have mapped the impact of one of the largest energy-supply shocks in history.

More of our data and visual reporting this week:

New data from SIPRI, a think-tank, show a big shift in military budgets. Sondre Solstad explained that, when adjusted for spending power, America’s allies now outspend Uncle Sam for the first time since 2001.

Britain’s new rent act came into effect on May 1st. The new law attempts to tackle genuine insecurity, but it could have unintended consequences. James Fransham laid out what is changing for landlords and tenants.

Below Rosamund Pearce explains how projections change how we perceive objects. She shares how she chooses the right angle for diagrams in our interactive articles.

Thanks for reading our newsletter. Please send your feedback to offthecharts@economist.com.

Let ’s keep things in perspective

Rosamund Pearce

Visual data journalist

We’ve written much about map projections—how we translate Earth’s curved surface onto a flat image—in this newsletter. But what about other three-dimensional objects? We often use diagrams and illustrations to tell stories. To create a 3D model of, say, the anatomy of a leaf, we also need to decide on a projection.

The cabinet projection is often used in instruction manuals

Oblique projections are useful when one face of the object should remain undistorted. In the military projection above, the top of the cube remains square, so you can show the height of a building while keeping the floorplan in proportion. Our cutaway of a leaf (see below)—while more organic in appearance—follows a similar logic.

We left the front face (relatively) unskewed, for a clear cross-section of the cells

I am fond of isometric projections because they remind me of some of the videogames I grew up with, such as “The Sims”. If I draw a cube in the isometric projection each face appears equal in size, since the three axes (x, y and z) are spaced evenly:

In the dimetric projection, two of the visible faces are the same area. In the trimetric projection none are

This makes the isometric projection a great choice when the proportions within an image matter, such as in our diagram of Chernobyl’s fourth reactor (first below) or for the size of flats in Hong Kong (second below). We considered a top-down view for the latter since the floor area was central to the story. However, a flat diagram—as well as being less fun—would make it harder to show the doors and windows (of which there are depressingly few per inhabitant).

With an isometric projection, the front of the power plant is no larger than the back

An isometric projection makes it easy to tweak the layout

Because everything is in proportion I can move one of the “coffin” homes in the diagram above and nothing needs to change size. There is no horizon or vanishing point where objects shrink to nothing. I could keep adding more and more rows of coffin homes, endlessly extending the scene. This is handy for video games, or really tall diagrams.

An example of different perspective projections

The perspective projection makes closer objects appear larger. Perspective is great for naturalistic scenes, since this is how we naturally perceive the world. It is easy to give elements emphasis; simply move them to the foreground.

The man on his phone is probably one of the first things you spot, even before we zoom in

If we want to portray movement we need a video or a 3D model, since objects need to change appearance as they travel through the scene (or the whole scene needs to change as the “camera” moves through it). Tools such as Blender and three.js make the perspective projection easy: simply switch the “camera” from orthographic to perspective:

Two very different views of thesame area

Most of our graphics are two-dimensional. For the diagram about geothermal power below, we felt that a simpler treatment kept the focus on the story we were trying to tell—the difference between the technologies. A flat design is often the best choice for a diagram with a scale.

A two-dimensional approach worked best

I also prefer a 2D design for diagrams with lots of labels. Adding too much flat text can spoil the illusion. When projected (below), the text looks as though it is part of the illustration, but it also makes it harder to read.

Of course you can project the text —but that doesn’t mean you should

The trouble with two dimensions is that they give us a limited view. How do we know that a square is a cube if we only see one side of it? Sharp-eyed readers may have noticed that, while the geothermal diagram as a whole is 2D, some of the elements in the scene aren’t. Similarly if the schematic below was truly 2D the edges of the spacecraft and its booster rocket would be straight.

Adding a slight tilt gives us a better understanding of the shape

When picking a graphical projection, we usually choose between a handful compared with dozens of map projections. But hand-drawn illustrations are tricky to tweak if we change our minds later. So before sketching the diagram, it is best to consider each and every angle.

Editor’s picks

A selection of must-read articles

Ripple effects

Mapping the Iran war’s trade disruption

Petrol prices are rising. So are those of plastics and pistachios

Bodge job

Watch out for the unintended consequences of Britain’s rent act

The government’s new law threatens to make renting worse, not better

Boom time

By one measure, America’s allies now outspend it on defence

Our annual ranking of military budgets shows the biggest shift since 2001

[![]() ]( )

[]( )

Donald Trump’s approval tracker

Find out his net approval rating.

What our data journalists are reading

▸| AI is making digital fraud easier, faster and harder to stop (Bloomberg)

▸| Internal ICE records reveal widespread use of force in detention centres (_Washington Post_)

▸| Thousands of North Koreans fought for Russia. A memorial hints at the death toll (BBC)

▸| Singapore hit pause on data centres. Its neighbours inherited the gold rush, and the environmental bill (Kontinentalist)

▸| Fifteen maps that changed how we see the ocean floor (Library of lost maps)

▸| Comparisons as predictable as the sunrise: An analysis of 200,000 similes from popular fiction (Pudding)

Asia Bulletin

Your guide to politics, trade and tumult in Asia

Get exclusive analysis and colourful dispatches tackling the biggest political, social and economic stories from a vast region

A MESSAGE FROM ECONOMIST EDUCATION

Business writing and storytelling

Our business-writing course now includes tips on harnessing AI for ideas and feedback—without replacing human judgment. Save 15% with ECONSUB15.

Enroll

Learn about Economist Education

Download our app for iOS and Android

This email has been sent to spence.burleigh@gmail.com because you signed up for this newsletter or because it is included in your subscription.

Registered in England and Wales. No. 236383.

The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London, WC2N 6HT

View email onlinePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2026. All rights reserved.

This email was sent to: spence.burleigh@gmail.com

This email was sent by: The Economist Newspaper Ltd., The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London, London, WC2N 6HT, GB