Good science starts with intellectual honesty, and I am not seeing it.
I 100% believe the quote below and zero percent believe the seemingly similar– but actually very different—quote that @geoffreyhinton attributes to me (which I couldn’t find anywhere on Google except on his own webpage!).
what I actually said (see below) is that part of what LLMs do is regurgitate (“partially” is the key word); they sometimes do! a huge body of literature has made this clear. this is what I believe.
what Hinton has on his web page is either fabricated (nobody has found a source for it) or at the very least out of context with what i have said for years eg about hallucinations and boneheaded errors (which are certainly not literal verbatim repetitions; that’s the whole point).
attacking a view that I clearly do not hold is not fair play — and certainly beneath what someone with a @NobelPrize should do.
SE Gyges (@segyges)
"Partial regurgitation, no matter how fluent, does not, and will not ever, constitute genuine comprehension.
Getting to real AI will require a different approach."
— https://nitter.net/segyges/status/2054297170002739315#m